Do we need a call?
No — and that's by design. Everything happens in writing: your intake form, my questions, the report, and (on the top tier) 14 days of Q&A. You get answers you can re-read and forward, not notes from a meeting. I never require calls at any tier.
What exactly is the "AI-visibility" part?
I check how AI assistants — ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews — describe your brand and whether they cite you for the queries your buyers actually ask. The middle tier gets a snapshot of the current state. The top tier gets a full GEO audit: citation checks across assistants, llms.txt, your robots/AI-crawler policy, and structured-data gaps, plus concrete fixes in the implementation backlog.
Will this guarantee a conversion increase?
No, and be wary of anyone who guarantees one. An audit identifies what's most likely suppressing conversions and AI visibility, ranked by expected impact vs. effort. What I guarantee is the deliverable: specific, prioritized, on time.
What do I receive, concretely?
A written report (PDF + Markdown) with numbered findings. Each finding: screenshot or quote of the element, why it's a problem, what to change, and a priority score. The top tier adds a separate implementation backlog formatted as ticket-ready tasks with acceptance criteria — paste them straight into Jira, Linear, or Trello.
Do you implement the fixes too?
This is the audit. If you want implementation afterwards, message me and we can scope it as a separate custom offer — still fully async.
Do you need access to my analytics or code?
No access is required. Read-only analytics access (or even screenshots of your funnel numbers) makes the prioritization sharper, but the audit stands without it. I never need code access or admin rights.